Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Former D.A. John Bongivengo  (Read 841 times)
Melissa
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1024


« on: August 08, 2011, 08:11:07 PM »


Well well...Look what's been going on at the district attorney's office...

http://www.ncnewsonline.com/topstories/x541067520/Probe-focuses-on-former-district-attorney-funds

August 8, 2011
Probe focuses on former district attorney funds
Debbie Wachter Morris
New Castle News

NEW CASTLE — State police have served two search warrants and obtained bank records from the former Lawrence County district attorney’s administration.

The investigation surrounds arson and drug task force money they allege was unaccounted for during the term of John Bongivengo.

District Judge Melissa A. Amodie granted the search warrants March 25 and state police filed the results July 20, according to court papers.

One was served March 31 at First National Bank, 32 N. Mill St., where investigators took financial papers of the arson investigation team.

The other was served April 27 at First Commonwealth Bank, 27 E. Washington St., where police obtained records regarding drug task force seizure funds.

The state police special investigations unit from Erie is conducting the probe, which began Nov. 3, 2009, according to court documents.

The investigation focuses on disposition of restitution paid to the district attorney’s office and cash seizures stored there as a result of police investigations between Jan. 2, 2006, and Jan. 4, 2010.

After conducting interviews with current district attorney, Joshua Lamancusa, his staff, police agencies, crime victims and defendants, it has been determined that several circumstances exist where money was paid to and/or stored at the district attorney’s office and is unaccounted for, the paperwork said.

A ledger kept to record restitution payments also disappeared prior to Lamancusa taking office, the court documents note.

Interviews with Lamancusa and his staff have revealed at that time, the office had no specific account to manage money received for restitution, and that money collected for that purpose may have been deposited and disbursed from the accounts identified, state police indicated.

Specifically, Ellwood City police delivered to the district attorney’s office $2,180 seized in a drug investigation, investigators said. That money later was determined to be missing and unaccounted for, they allege.

The police also allege $4,951 in restitution payments by three defendants were not forwarded to the victims of three separate crimes.

“The bank account materials sought are necessary to determine whether the missing moneys were or were not deposited and, if withdrawn, by whom,” the court documents note.

Lamancusa said the investigation began before he took office in January 2010.

“I was informed of it when I took office by troopers and the office of the attorney general,” he said.

Lamancusa said investigators have interviewed him about office policies and practices and his knowledge of past practices, “but I’m not privy to the details of the investigation.”

Bongivengo said he has not been interviewed by investigators and, until contacted by The News, was unaware of any probe.

“Obviously I’m out of the loop on it.”

Lamancusa said he has made “substantial changes” in the district attorney’s office, from processing cases to financial accounting and how the office receives restitution money. He noted that the county and state audit funds of his office.

Lawrence County Controller David Gettings said his office oversees the district attorney’s office’s annual audit, but in the past it did not see restitution or drug money records.

Since Lamancusa took office, the restitution money runs through the county’s records and checks are written from the controller’s office, he said. Lamancusa deposits that money at the prothonotary’s office, “and the money is paid in and paid out so there is a trail.”
Logged

gloria
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 902


« Reply #1 on: August 08, 2011, 08:51:12 PM »


lol I know, couldn't help but smile when I saw that article. Karma back his way I guess. Do you think we will see a mug shot of him any time soon? who knows, but it would be priceless lol.
Logged

Bryan
Full Member
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 691


WWW
« Reply #2 on: August 09, 2011, 08:15:37 AM »


I like to ask the obvious question: why does this have to do with Jordan's case? Then I remember what I said also happened before Jordan was jailed. Johnny was troubled by his failure to get a boy of sixteen tried as an adult on more serious homicide charges after the kid allegedly gave his girlfriend the pills she overdosed on. Though it did lead to the boy being kicked out of school, Johnny did not succeed getting adult time to this young teen. The kid then was free to file a civil lawsuit against the district for using his off-campus habits to boot him out. You have a lot of ticked off people putting pressure on Johnny to do something or be seen as being "soft on juvenile crime". So he latches on Jordan, a boy of eleven when this alleged sin occured. He was flying blind into an whilrwind. His inevitable unseating only confirmed his mistake.

Now this case of missing money is quite troubling. How can this connect to Jordan's false imprisonment? I thought this was a conspiracy between the Harveys and the Houks. Adam killed Kenzie with the full knowledge of the system's pliability to get it wrong. Adam's father used his connections in the system to further get Jordan into this mess. The topper being the fear of death from Adam's own hand scaringthe Houks into cooperating with this whole sham charade.

Now it seems too complex. What mob is after whom?
« Last Edit: August 09, 2011, 08:48:53 AM by Bryan » Logged

grasping the short straw

Marie
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 248


« Reply #3 on: August 09, 2011, 06:14:59 PM »


Maybe it just shows the dishonesty that may have permeated the intentions surrounding the way the case was handled.

Also, if the case in fact goes to juvenile and the Judge does rule guilty, as someone here said this is a very real possibility, why then would it not be better to have a jury of peers?

Also, doesn't the Judge have to rule based on evidence, not prejudice? How could he find him guilty with complete certainty?
Logged

abram
Full Member
Full Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 106


« Reply #4 on: August 09, 2011, 07:20:33 PM »


Marie, Judge Motto can't even be trusted to know the constitution so I wouldn't trust him to judge evidence and Jordan either.  In fact I believe he has a prejudice and if not then I certainly claim it would be harmful to Jordan for Judge Motto to be involved in the case, period.
Logged

Marie
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 248


« Reply #5 on: August 09, 2011, 07:55:45 PM »


Then he needs to not be involved.
Logged

gloria
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 902


« Reply #6 on: August 10, 2011, 03:55:07 PM »


right Marie, I would say, Judge Motto should not decide Jordan's fate. And I don't think he will ever stand in front of a "jury of his peers" if you know what I mean. I think Jordan won't stand a chance in adult court. Actually childrens never have a fair trial on adult court, when a child faces a LWOP  in adult court he always is found guilty not matter he is innocent. There is not justice for children when they are treated as adults. So, no he should not be tried as an adult. That's not an option.  Too dangerous.
Logged

Marie
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 248


« Reply #7 on: August 10, 2011, 06:11:58 PM »


I would not want Jordan in adult court ever but I am concerned about the bias the Judge showed prior.  I 'll be honest, I am concerned about the bias they can pass on if another judge was granted the case.  It is sad to think about, and maybe undeserving, but judges know judges, prosecutors know prosecutors, etc.  If they want a conviction, they can exchange favors and no one can prove it.   That was hard to say as I know a very honest judge who tries extremely hard not to mix socially where he can become vulnerable. 

 I do not believe children this young should ever be exposed publicly for the simple fact they they are vulnerable and need extra protection.   I also feel that Jordan is innocent and there was a rush to judgment and possibly a push of illegal intervention that got him where he is today. It makes me ill to think of the children that get used by the system and have no one backing them. It is so wrong.

I still am very amazed that this case is still lingering. Everyone I know, educated or not, cannot get over this dragging of time for an 11 year-old child. 

You can see from the case "cash for kids" in PA, where the judges were accepting money in exchange for children needed to keep a juvenile center running, that even an adult  can end up with less time than a child this young.  Not just an adult, an authority of the judicial system who put children in harms way for minor offenses.  Is this what happens when we gain too much power?  Checks and balances should always be in place.  I am amazed at what they did to some of those children and I question whether they would have done the same thing to someone with clout and a lot of money.

I have always felt the need for higher requirements within the police force all the way up.  If you think about it, teachers are required to hold a very high standard, and rightfully so, but often we see law-enforcement, lawyers, judges, etc. escape such critical demands. How did this happen?

Maybe there needs to be a complete outside investigation done within the courts in Pennsylvania.  They seem to be on a clean-up pattern.  I hope they keep it up.

Maybe Judge Motto will prove us wrong and have the ability to base an unbiased opinion in favor of an acquittal....

Judges are but men, and are swayed like other men by vehement prejudices.  This is corruption in reality, give it whatever other name you please.  ~David Dudley Field
Logged

Pages: [1]
Print
Jump to: